PRAGMATIC ROLES OF EXCLUSION QUALIFIERS IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS LINKING THEIR SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE TO THEIR COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTION

Authors

  • Nilufar Mirzaholova Komildjanovna Freelance English teacher and translator

Keywords:

Keywords: Exclusion qualifiers, discourse analysis, syntactic structure, conversational pragmatics, academic writing, legal language.

Abstract

Abstract: Exclusion qualifiers are linguistic tools that limit or modify the scope of a statement, allowing speakers or writers to exclude certain aspects without outright falsification. This study explores the use of exclusion qualifiers in different contexts, including everyday conversation, academic writing, and legal discourse. Through syntactic analysis, the research examines how these qualifiers function and their effect on meaning, clarity, and interpretation. Findings suggest that exclusion qualifiers are used strategically to withhold information, generalize claims, and create ambiguity in varying contexts.

References

REFERENCES:

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. John Benjamins Publishing.

Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal Language. University of Chicago Press.

https://youtu.be/KfkOSYpMToo?si=CiaDRjZLFOyAeJHV

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmNErkb_uIpkyES6GHGzgN8TMdNJlx4AW&si=S0J6AkwTxSvfbkKy

https://youtu.be/kb5heUJr0E0?si=h3O_gRE7m2rREeJS

https://youtu.be/7LC0RIwmr5A?si=_S5KT1aLBh8xK_6S

Downloads

Published

2024-10-12