PRAGMATIC ROLES OF EXCLUSION QUALIFIERS IN DIFFERENT CONTEXTS LINKING THEIR SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE TO THEIR COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTION
Keywords:
Keywords: Exclusion qualifiers, discourse analysis, syntactic structure, conversational pragmatics, academic writing, legal language.Abstract
Abstract: Exclusion qualifiers are linguistic tools that limit or modify the scope of a statement, allowing speakers or writers to exclude certain aspects without outright falsification. This study explores the use of exclusion qualifiers in different contexts, including everyday conversation, academic writing, and legal discourse. Through syntactic analysis, the research examines how these qualifiers function and their effect on meaning, clarity, and interpretation. Findings suggest that exclusion qualifiers are used strategically to withhold information, generalize claims, and create ambiguity in varying contexts.
References
REFERENCES:
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. John Benjamins Publishing.
Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal Language. University of Chicago Press.
https://youtu.be/KfkOSYpMToo?si=CiaDRjZLFOyAeJHV
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmNErkb_uIpkyES6GHGzgN8TMdNJlx4AW&si=S0J6AkwTxSvfbkKy